Who is the World’s Best Prime Minister? – Best Prime Minister

Best Prime Minister:

Among all the office-bearers established by the Constitution of the fifth Republic of France, the position of the Prime Minister only after the President The President of the French governance department is on one side of the double-styled frame and the Prime Minister on the other hand.

These two poles have been called two names in the constitution. The President is the guardian of the constitution. He is the head of the state, he is regarded as the protector of national independence, territorial integrity or a guarantor. On the other hand, the Prime Minister is the leader of the government.

He also took responsibility for national defense. He assured the law and order. He used to be the governor of divisional power. Prime Minister (section 21), after the removal of all the military and civilian officials, who excluded the other military and civil officials. Thus, the dual-ruling divisional authority has been established in the constitution of the fifth republic.

Prime Minister Niag:

The President appointed the Prime Minister as the head of the state. There is no detailed discussion on the constitution of the Prime Minister. The President appointed the Prime Minister.

Like Britain, the leader of the majority party of the National Assembly of the Parliament’s National Assembly will have to leave the Prime Minister, there is no such provision in the constitution. The Prime Minister can not be a member of the parliament in France.

If a member of parliament is appointed a prime minister, then he has to leave the parliamentary membership. There is no constitutional power in the national meeting of the Prime Minister. The decision of the President is final in the case of the Prime Minister’s resignation.

There is no need for the signature of the outgoing Prime Minister or any other minister to implement the Prime Minister’s decision. In general, the Prime Minister’s Neighbat is generally included in the President’s voluntary or self-discretionary capacity.

The President is not obliged to consider that there is a majority in any national party. But the government, including the Prime Minister, is responsible for the Nation meeting, it is better to take the majority of the deputy’s delegation to the Prime Minister from the alliance or the prime minister.

If there is the absolute dominance of the President’s party at the national meeting, the Prime Minister does not face any disadvantage in the situation.

The Prime Minister’s tenure is in relation to politics and his confidence

In the constitution, the tenure of the prime minister was accepted. But the President can not force the Prime Minister to resign.

He submitted the resignation letter to the President. If any condemnative suggestion raised in the national meeting is taken into consideration then Chief Minister

Can not force. It is mentioned in the constitution that the Prime Minister submitted the resignation letter of the government when the government, if the government, headed by the Prime Minister, had rejected a national meeting to resign, then the Prime Minister, including the Prime Minister, were accepted. Without reason, many situations arise when the Prime Minister is forced to resign.

They have to accept opinions and policies, or else they will have to resign. The President and the Prime Minister achieved prominence. Prime Minister resigns and resigns. If the Prime Minister does not accept the President’s opinion, it can trigger the resignation of the prime minister by affecting 4 ministers. Thus, in 1976, the President forced Prime Minister Shirak to resign.

If the ruling party is defeated in the election of the lower house of the French parliament, the Prime Minister can submit the resignation letter.

In the March 1993 election, the presidential election of the President of Mote’s Socialist Party was defeated. Team | By accepting the responsibility of the election, Prime Minister Pierre Bergevovy resigned.

But in the fourth republic, the Prime Minister has changed quickly. His exception was observed in the fifth republic. Because of the prime minister’s long-standing power. It has been possible to fulfill his duty as per the specific plan.

Prime Minister’s powers and functions:

The judgments of the powers, functions, and role of the role are judged and analyzed, in the fifth constitution of the French Republic. The Prime Minister’s position undoubtedly gained much more important than the previous republic. In terms of role, the position of Prime Minister has gained a new dimension.

In the current constitution many powers and functions of the Prime Minister. And different. In the third chapter of this constitution, the description of the functions of the French government in section 20 to 23, its main Responsibility is entrusted to the Prime Minister. At present, the Prime Minister loses control of governance, law, and counseling.

The powers and functions of the Prime Minister are as follows:

Prime Minister of the Prime Minister Ensures the government’s ability to set and administer national policy in the constitution. Has been there. He took the lead role in the main role of the government.

All policy matters of the government. And the problem is that he really took a leading role in raising and executing. There is a great field in determining policy and reducing power and responsibility. From within its borders, he has to schedule other duties. The Prime Minister presided over the meeting of the cabinet. All the powers entrusted to him in the form of cabinet Have there.

The Prime Minister is the leader of the government. He has been entrusted with the responsibility of national defense. In section 21, it is mentioned that this responsibility is considered as a very important factor.

However, the Prime Minister’s power is not single. Under the constitution, the President has been called the supreme commander or director of the military.

The President presided over the meeting of the Higher National Defense Council and Committee. But in the absence or absence of the President, the Prime Minister presided over the meeting of the Higher National Defense Council and its Committee.

The Prime Minister may appoint a military post, but the constitution has been entrusted with the equal rights of the President.

President can appoint army officers. So the power that has been entrusted to the Prime Minister on military affairs is indeed joint power and joint jurisdiction. As a result, the power of this power can cause dissent among the President and the Prime Minister.

Seventeen, the President appointed the ministers. However, he accepted the advice of the Prime Minister in their leave and depreciation.

In this case, the power of the Prime Minister of France is similar to the British Prime Minister. Because of the advice of the Prime Minister, the queen emancipated the ministers and relinquished the responsibility.

Power has been given to the Prime Minister to issue rule-divisional instructions. Presided by the President. The Prime Minister’s signature sign before the cemetery, which ordinates and administrative instructions are made in the cabinet meeting.

The Prime Minister decides whether any contract will be sent to the constitutional council.

Law enforcement powers:

The legal authority of the Prime Minister of France is also very important. Like the British Prime Minister, he is not a member of the legislature, but in the constitution, he has been entrusted with some powers which are very important. It is considered important. These powers are as follows.

The president can break the national meeting. However, he and the Prime Minister of both the chambers of the house of the President followed this power. But national meetings can not be broken twice in a year. The prime minister is responsible for the laws which the President intends to implement and where the concerned minister is concerned.

Can order the ordinance mandate for a specific period of time. After passing the state, the Cabinet decided on this matter. These bills are effective after the ordination is wound up. But during the 4th time, the bill will be canceled if it is not submitted for the conjugation of the bail. Kara can claim. With the state council.

After discussions with the Prime Minister, after a general assault on the government’s agenda or policy. You can ask for close proximity to the meeting. The National Assembly can express disproportionate influence on the government’s program or the e-affiliation through accepting the condemnatory proposal in this case.

This condemnatory stone will be considered valid only if the national meeting is signed by the one-on-one. If such condemnatory suggestion is rejected then that session will be no more. A proposal cannot be raised.

The prime minister can ask for a full bill or any special proposal or proposal of a national meeting of the national meeting after the Alchun. If no defamatory proposal is raised in 24 after raising the bill or proposal, the bill will be deemed to have been passed.

Prime Minister or President of any room in Parliament or 60 deputies or 60 people. If the constitutional council decides that any section of the international agreement is bound by the constitution, then the agreement can not be enforced or re-approved before the necessary changes can be made.

According to the advice of the Prime Minister, a special session of Parliament can be called for discussion of specific issues. When the special meeting of the Parliament is held in the context of the national meeting, then the matter is decided after the completion of the matter.

E Parliament passed the end of the parliament session. Only one month after the completion of the special session. Special meetings can be called for the prime minister’s approval.

The Prime Minister has the power of the government as well as in the public interest. In between the two sessions of the parliament, according to a joint proposal of both the government or the parliament, a government agency framework, a contract related to the community, a constitution which is not restricted to the constitution, the existing government agency framework

The law of the law can be presented in the public debate. If the government bill is passed in the public debate, the constitution will be binding within that time In accordance with Article 10 of the Constitution, within 15 days after the bill was passed by the parliament, the President condemned it and sent it to the government. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s main role is to initiate the act. Is to accept.

Eleventh, the Prime Minister is the head of the government. That is why in both the parliamentary chambers of the government, on behalf of the government. The Prime Minister has to present the statement.

If the condemnatory proposal is raised against the government, then the answer to the verdict of the defendants is mainly to give him the answer. Prime Minister and his cabinet resign if any proposal of Prime Minister is defeated in the national meeting.

The Prime Minister also took the initiative in passing the government bill passed by the government in Parliament. The government has to resign when a national bill is passed in the national budget. For this reason, he has to always remain united in the national meeting and the government. The Prime Minister has to be always zealous for maintaining the government’s dominance in the country.

Other capabilities:

The other powers of the Prime Minister are as follows

To protect the unity and solidarity of the government and the Prime Minister, the Prime Minister can make many decisions without considering the unity of government and other ministers of solidarity.

But this method is not desirable. In order to maintain the stability of the government and to implement the policies of co-operation and co-operation, the Prime Minister has to regularly manage the government with understanding with other ministers. If the opposite path is taken, the government and the government can catch the breakdown. The breakdown may cause the government to fall.

Coordination between the different departments and the Prime Minister has to play the role of coordinator. He coordinates between various departments of the government. The coordination of this work is as efficient and accelerated as the craft of government increases.

In the modern state administration, the coordination between the various departments, committees and the activities of the commission is a serious responsibility. So the success of coordination is the success indicators of success.

From the above discussion, it is clear that the powers and functions of the French Prime Minister are numerous and comprehensive. State act His importance and influence in the field of management is beyond the debate.

In the constitution of the previous third and fourth republic, the scope of the power and authority of the French Prime Minister was not so elaborate. But in the constitution of the fifth republic, in the hands of the Prime Minister. More power has been entrusted and naturally, its influence has increased significantly more than before.

Prime Minister’s role and rank:

On the relation between the cabinet members and the relation between the prime minister’s role and the status of any country dependent. It is necessary to create a cooperative and co-environment with the other ministers of the Prime Minister. It is not possible for any prime minister to deny the cabinet and conduct the work and be led by the leadership.

The Prime Minister, with no political experience, tried to break the beliefs of his colleagues and become an independent center of power. Because of this, political instability will be created. The ability to decide independently by the Prime Minister depends on his personality and circumstances.

According to the constitution, the Prime Minister has to take cabinet advice in some cases. Once again, he can pray for himself. The voluntary power has expanded the power of the Prime Minister.

The comparative impact of the President and the Prime Minister’s personality is very important in determining the rank of Prime Minister. Considered to be a subject.

If both the office-bearers have political personality, but on the one hand the prime minister’s self-sufficiency is at the same time, similarly the conflict of personality between the two officials is inadequate to govern the state. Will cause problems.

A favorable situation can be developed between the President and the Prime Minister if the presidential party. There is a majority and there is a policy and programmatic consistency between the President and the Prime Minister.

Again the President and Though the Prime Minister is in the same group, differences between the two can be seen. However, both the officials are important. So the prime minister’s role depends on his personality, political situation, the popularity of the prime minister, political strategy, his position in the party, his relations with the members of the cabinet, etc. But the Prime Minister can not become the President’s rivalry.

In the regime of France, the post of Prime Minister has been under examination for a long time. Since the 1946 constitution, efforts to increase the importance and dignity of the Prime Minister were observed.

Before that, the Prime Minister’s role in the constitution was not of any significance in the third Republic. Then the members of the cabinet were appointed from within the Parliament’s Biwi Matabbalambi Gatheshi.

According to the constitutional constitution of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic, according to the Constitution of 1946, the Prime Minister was the ruler of France because of the constitution of the fourth republic.

A minister wants to sign a letter to all. Moreover, there was no cabinet at the time. Because of this, no significant role could be played. In fact, the Prime Minister’s power in the fourth republic’s constitution was limited to the politician.

However, the power and influence of the French Prime Minister have increased in the constitution of the fifth republic. Prime Minister’s post has been planned in the constitution of the fifth republic with some of the main components of the Constitution. French Prime Minister protects the principle of joint responsibility of the French president and constitution of the constitution

Efforts have been made to organize. In fact, in the current constitution, a number of parliamentary elections have been tried. According to the 1958 constitution, the French government was formed by the Prime Minister and other Ministers. The Prime Minister points to the government’s activities.

The prime minister’s role in the government’s policy decision-making and governance Although the president is the president of the cabinet, the prime minister is its leader. The responsibility of the guardian of the nation on the President.

But the responsibility for determining the national policy is to be held responsible for the overall policy of the government as well as on the Prime Minister. From time to time, the President is the chiefly the controller of the cabinet.

And his opinion! It is not possible for the Prime Minister to work on neglecting the lack. So the French President in the constitution of the fifth republic Has crossed the Prime Minister. Like the prime minister of the parliamentary system, the French Prime Minister could not establish his power and influence.

Under the President’s position, the position of the President of the country is below him. The French Prime Minister could not expand his influence in any case in either a constitutional or political system.

Therefore, the position of the President is above the prime minister in the French state. It is said that the Prime Minister has to fulfill his duties from the shadow of the French President. In spite of this, the importance of the Prime Minister’s role in governing the government of the country is undeniable.

Though Britain and France are liberal democratic states, there is more in the nature of governance in these two countries than the uniformity of the two.

The motherland of the parliamentary system of governance; But France’s regime came to parliament. A peculiar combination of the President-ruled regime. In the regime of both Britain and France, the position of the Prime Minister is now. But the status, power, duties, and status of Prime Minister of both countries are not uniform.

Similarities between the similarities and the British Prime Minister and the French Prime Minister are similar. Similarities are as follows:

Britain’s President Raja or Queen appointed the British Prime Minister. Likewise, the French Prime Minister appointed. President of France’s President. The British Prime Minister and the French Prime Minister are the heads of the government of their own country.

The British Prime Minister, acting as the Chief Counsel of the King or Queen, the French President is constitutionally obliged to consult with the Prime Minister on many matters. Breaking the Commons meeting; Increasing the number of members of the Lord’s meeting: Distribution of honorary titles; Highly-appointed government employee, Bishop, Dean, and Canon, senior judicial magistrate Nayak.

Before that, the King or Queen consulted with the British Prime Minister. Therefore, the dissolution of the national meeting, the decree of the special session of the Parliament, and the declaration of the termination.

The embarrassment of the country, the question of the constitution of any law, and the dispatch of the relevant legislation to the constitutional council. In case of the President or the Prime Minister to consult with the President, It is said in the constitution as per the constitution.

The Prime Minister has taken a decisive role in the formation of the British Cabinet. By the advice of the Prime Minister. The King or Queen of England formed the cabinet.

Likewise, the French Prime Minister’s role in French cabinet formation is particularly important. The Prime Minister’s signature is required in the direction of the President’s direction regarding the legality of the ministers.

Like the British Prime Minister, the French Prime Minister is also the leader of the respective cabinets. As leader of cabinets. The Prime Minister of both countries possesses important power.

To divide and redistribute the offices among the ministers, preside over the meeting of the cabinet, to determine the cabinet secretory agenda, to take initiative for policy-making, to take necessary action to implement the accepted policies, and to keep close zygages in cabinets with the parliament.

According to the constitution, the Prime Minister and his government in France, like in Great Britain, has to remain responsible for all decisions and activities in the lower house of parliament and Great Britain has lost its support to the lower house of parliament. And both the Prime Ministers of France and their governments have to resign.

Contrast:

Despite the existence of the aforementioned similarity, the British Prime Minister and the French Prime Minister. There is more contrast between. In fact, the fundamental nature of these two office-bearers is in contrast.

The reasons for the fundamental difference between the British and the French Prime Minister are in the framework and nature difference between the governance of both the countries. Below are several basic differences or differences between British and French Prime Ministers.

Differences in constitutional recognition:

The charioteer of the whole British political system, centered around the Prime Minister Although rotating, there is no constitutional basis for his power, functions, and rank.

The British constitution is mainly unacquainted. The Prime Minister’s post was formed on the basis of constitutional customs.

King or Queen of the United Kingdom is the head of the majority party or leader of the party

There are many differences. The king of the United Kingdom or the King said. However, in the Commons meeting, if a team of the absolute majority cannot achieve an absolute majority, then the king or the queen can according to her according to the Prime Minister.

In this way, in 1924, the leader of the liberal party leader Asakuhath’s party called on McDonald to form the cabinet. The president of the constitution will not accept the Prime Minister. It is nowhere to say that the President is the majority party or the leader of the National Assembly or the leader of the leader of the Prime Minister.

That is, the President’s voluntary power in reducing the power to relieve the Prime Minister. Therefore, in this case, he is not obliged to accept the directives of the national meeting. In this context, the financier does not say that such a power of the President has the power to control the non-control of the National Assembly.

The fifth President of the fifth Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the country had nominated Popeidu as the Prime Minister despite the opposition.

The difference in the membership of the legislation and the introduction of the parliamentary system of governance in the United Kingdom, the policy of empowerment is not followed at all. So the Prime Minister and members of his cabinet are certainly members of the parliament

If the prime minister or any other minister is not a member of the parliament, then he may remain in power for only a month after being appointed to that position. They do not become members of any parliament in this period

It is obligatory to leave the constitution somewhere. They have to resign if they can be inNosegayg.

But the opposite image in France is noticed. Here implies the United States policy of power-independence. ‘Incompatibility policy has been adopted.

As a result, a minister with the Prime Minister and the Cabinet and the Cabinet Council together. Can not be a member. Remarkable issues – The prime minister or other minister has to be elected first in the lower house of Parliament or the National Assembly.

But after being appointed as the Prime Minister or any other minister, they were forced to leave the parliament’s membership.

The duration of the tenure of the tenure and the tenure of the British prime minister’s tenure is five years. But before losing the confidence of the Commons meeting before the end of the term, he and his cabinet had to resign.

The highlight of the topic – that is. For any reason, the prime minister is forced to resign when the Prime Minister resigns, with the help of the whole cabinet.

But in the French constitution, there was no explicit word about the term of the prime minister’s tenure somewhere. In the constitution, It has been said only that if the Prime Minister submits his resignation to the President, he will accept it.

So, as long as the Prime Minister is not presenting his resignation to the President, the President gave him his resignation. Can not remove. However, there is a clear indication of the constitution that if a resolution of a condemnation of a national meeting against the government or a government program or policy of the government is canceled at the national meeting or the government’s nationality.

If the meeting is defeated in confidence, the Prime Minister has to resign. However, in theory, the president may actually want it. The Prime Minister is forced to resign. Thus, Popidu in 1968, Shaba-Delma in 1972 and Shirak in 1976. Had to resign. But with the King or Queen in the United States, there is a difference of opinion but the Commons meeting the trusted Prime Minister.

The difference between the constitution of the cabinet and the UK Prime Minister also presided over their meetings as cabinet ministers and cabinet leaders.

Although the Council of Ministers is formed with all types of ministers, only the prime minister and cabinet-ministers have got a place in the small-cabinet cabinet.

In other words, Cabinet cabinets. In addition to the ministers, the state minister, the parliamentary subordinate secretary, the Attorney General, the solicitor general, the Comptroller are among others. Only Cabinet and cabinet ministers are formed.

There is a difference between the Council of Ministers and the Cabinet-Council in France. Here the cabinet council consists of the Prime Minister, Cabinet Minister, Minister of State, Deputy Minister.

On the other hand, only the Prime Minister is in the Cabinet. And cabinet ministers. In other words, there are structural structures similar to British cabinets with the UK cabinets and French cabinets with French cabinets. Although the cabinet has more power and rank than the cabinet in the UK, cabinet ministers have more power and rank than cabinets.

Besides, the British Prime Minister is able to preside over the cabinet meetings and cabinets, but the French Prime Minister has no such power.

He presides over the meeting of less important cabinet-councils and he does not have the ability to preside normally in the cabinet meeting.

The President of the Cabinet chaired the President himself. But if the President wishes, and if the President and Prime Minister agree about the discussion agenda of the meeting, the Prime Minister may preside over the cabinet meeting.

The difference between the structure of the cabinet and the King or Queen in the UK is the systematic ruler. The Prime Minister is the governor.

Therefore, he presented the list of ministers in the name of Raja or Rani, who was appointed to the post of minister. But in France, the list of names of ministers in theoretically can be made by the Prime Minister, but in the work, he works only on the instructions of the All-Powerful President.

In fact, the list of ministers in the name of the Prime Minister presented to the President, mainly the trustees of the president has got a place.

So, it is possible that the Prime Minister’s ability to recommend the names of ministers is nothing but theoretical powers.

Due to differences in policy-making power and the cabinet headed by the Prime Minister in the UK, policy-making and national policy policies, and in those cases, the King or Queen works as a nominal ruler.

But the principle of determining the principle of principle in France is entrusted to the Prime Minister and his government, but the President has.

All decisions regarding the related matters were taken in the meeting of the cabinet held in the chairmanship. Needless to say, as the president of the meeting.

The president is able to have sufficient influence on the policy-making system. In reality, the President is national and international. Regarding the policy, and the government gives its impression of legitimacy.

Again, the President has made a policy of itself by keeping the Prime Minister in the dark, in the history of the fifth Republic of France. So, in principle, the British Prime Minister’s power is far more than the French Prime Minister.

The difference in governance power? The King or Queen of Great Britain is the head of the constitutional or nominative state. Governance is administered in his name, but he does not govern the governing.

His role was largely formal. King or The Prime Minister and his cabinet – Raja or Rani, are responsible for the work done in the name of the queen, to the parliament or the people.

And therefore, the direction of the minister of the queen is desirable by any direction of the king or queen. Otherwise, it is not considered enforceable and the Prime Minister’s letter is signed by the Divisional Ministers.

But in the current regime of France, the situation is different. The French President is the leader of the head and chief of government. However, in the case of the President, in principle in France, the Prime Minister’s signature is sought.

But the Prime Minister has to be responsible for national defense. Prasad presided over the President. Dominant hour) in France at all Rastrapati astrapradhana the sarbaecca power.

So the authority of the Prime Minister is established in France. British Prime Minister in terms of differences in legislation and power related legislation

The difference between the minister is elaborated. Britain’s House of Commons of the Parliament of the majority party leader, Prime Minister Paul “Mans meeting, the majority of the members of the active support of the Prime Minister always is present.

British Prime Minister or the North that the law commissioned the parliament to pass guarantee it. So that’s baruddhe British palamente no legislation can be No. In the case of the law of balance, the president The main king.

By virtue, the role of the Prime Minister in the process of legislation in France is not so important. In France, the Prime Minister or his cabinet members are not members of the parliament in the policy of power-independence.

For this reason, the French Prime Minister has no regulatory power or authority as it is the 4th Prime Minister of Parliament for legislation. In France, the decision to make a lawful decision was taken at the President’s residence.

The president of the French President is called “Elisee” and the Prime Minister plays his role in the decision of Elisee in the scandal of legislation. But, in principle, the Prime Minister’s law in parliament.

It can be as zealous as the members of parliament, and the prime minister and his government’s will-unwillingness are considered important in the making of the law.

It is evident from the comparative analysis that the French Prime Minister was more privileged and privileged than constitutionally British Prime Minister. But the opposite image can be seen in the realm of realization.

In fact, because the head of the UK is the systematic ruler, the Prime Minister has become the highest authority in the country. But in France, the Prime Minister is the principal head of the governing body, but in the workplace, he has become the puppet of the hand of the All-Powerful President. Needless to say, such as the weakness of the personality of the ksamatalindu suyaege The Galle was able to establish the de facto baenapatantrera in France.

A comparison of the French President and British Prime Minister:

The United Kingdom consists of a state administrative framework implemented in the tradition of a parliamentary regime. Many people called this country the ‘royal republic’.

Here the parliamentary system is firmly established. The French government can not be identified as a parliamentary or presidential government alone. Here is the coordination of the features of the parliamentary and president-ruled government.

That is why many analysts called him ‘semi-president-ruled government’. In short, the French government has a mixed government ‘or’ parliamentary government and the presidential system.

The government has identified some characteristics of the system. British Prime Minister and the French President, Miyanaga, powers, functions, etc. must be observed that analysis, in both official correspondences, as there are a few things, Likewise, there are several contradictions in some cases. Below are comparisons between the two

Similarities between the similarities and the President of France and Britain’s Prime Minister:

Great Britain and France are the traditional countries of liberal democracy. Both are included in the capitalist system. Through the rise of capitalist development, the political power of the Prime Minister and the President’s power at the peak of power has increased so much political preference.

The British Prime Minister and the French President have a specific tenure. The tenure of the British Prime Minister’s tenure and the year The President of France was elected for 7 years. He may be removed before the term of the British Prime Minister’s term expires. The majority of the Commons.

He can resign or advise the queen for breaking the session. He also had to resign if the party lost his confidence. Before the president’s term expired, he was ousted from the country due to the criminal offenses.

These two officials have played the role of the real ruler in their respective states. In fact, they are home and abroad. They have achieved the highest political status.

The power of controlling the government department is entrusted to them. In their respective areas, they are the chief policy makers. According to the situation, they explained their power. Both the office-bearers have become Amit’s powers and powers.

The president of France can assassinate the state of emergency. He is the ultimate judge of whether an emergency situation has arisen or not. But in this regard, he consulted with the constitutional council.

Prime Minister’s Advice in Great Britain According to the Queen forced the state of emergency. The Prime Minister has consulted with his adviser, cabinet, and his own secretariat. The British Prime Minister and the French President both received help from various committees and commission for the administration.

In both countries, the process of decision-making and decision-making was initiated through many administrative agencies and committees. Both the officials officially played the role of national leaders. They are the leaders of the national and international policy.

In spite of the above similarities, there are some fundamental differences or differences between the two executives. Below are descriptions of:

The encouragement difference between the post and the constitutional source of the post of the British Prime Minister and the French President is unique.

The terms of the French President have been created by the explicit rules of the constitution. So the rule of the President of France is the source of the regime.

But the traditional law, constitutional customs, in the fall of the British Prime Minister’s post. Only the Royal Ministers of 1937. Under the law, he has been called the ‘First Lord of the Department of the Treasury Department’.

Laws made in accordance with constitutional differences and the source of authority of the President of France, and the law made according to the Constitution. And decree. His power is obvious and precise.

Traditional law and constitutionalism in the light of the power of British Prime Minister. Customs But the powers that the Prime Minister entrusted with the power to the government through the law of parliament, you can do.

The difference between the election process and the British Prime Minister and the presidential election of the President of France are also distinct. Any person appointed to the post of British Prime Minister has to be elected to the Senate according to the established custom.

The party that won the absolute majority in the elections nominated the candidate for the post of Prime Minister and the Queen appointed him as the Prime Minister.

A person who is not a member of the Commons is nominated to the head of the government as the Prime Minister and the Queen has to be elected to the Commons within six months of taking oath as the Prime Minister to make him Prime Minister. But the president of France is not a member of the legislature.

If a candidate chooses to be elected, the majority of the valid VAT nominee in the election fails to gain 9 percent of the profits, but the presidential election is dependent on the absolute majority in the Ghadassana assembly, elected by the President who is elected by a majority of the first two candidates, according to the number of the eligible candidates.

No. The majority of the seats are Bhay To gain. If the ray is recruited in the first two candidates, it will be re-elected as the candidate. Differences related to discrepancy: In France, the verdict of the president is not desirable.

There is no special requirement for competing in the post-independence phase. If the candidate is to be eligible for the qualification to be elected to the state of Kamlesh,

The differences between the British Prime Minister and the British Prime Minister are different for the difference in the functional and the tenure of the term. 4. The tenure of the term of the French President’s tenure is 7 years. But the tenure of the British Prime Minister’s tenure is five years. However

All the way there can be no obstacle, they are both happy and happy. The President cannot be accused of any other scandal except for serious differences in the judiciary and serious crimes against the state.

The High Court judges him when he rises against the President. But the power to oust the Prime Minister has been handed over to the Commons meeting. As long as he is the majority member of the Commons meeting. If you are confident, you can stay in three stamps till then. If he lost his confidence in the Commons meeting, he had to resign

If any government bill was rejected, the Prime Minister and his cabinet resigned. 5. According to the difference between government power and the constitution of both the countries, in accordance with the rule of governance 4 different aspects of the Prime Minister are noticed, but in the respective cases, there is a significant difference between them.

The difference between the power of the Mayor, and the president of the French President State Council, the Lieutenant General’s Honor, the Grand Chancellor, the Ambassador and Special Trade Representative, the Master Counselor of the Court of Accounts, the Foreign Minister’s representative, the Academy Rector, and the Government Department.

In the cabinet meeting, he had to make a decision on these matters. Apart from these fields, the constitution has been entrusted to the Prime Minister (Section 21). Besides, the President is entitled to a military post.

But theoretically, the British Prime Minister has not been given the power to deal with. In all cases, the king or queen possesses extreme power. But in reality. Being a systematic ruler, he carried out all the activities related to Nayaga by consulting the Prime Minister.

Differences in terms of depreciation and depreciation of ministers and cabinet in France

The difference between the cabinet portal is determined. The cabinet meeting presides over the prime minister’s responsibility to conduct the meetings of the president and cabinet council. French The President appointed and dismissed the other Ministers in the proposal and his proposal. Prime Minister Nayeg many

During the time, the President can appoint another party member without nullifying his party member. But the King or Queen of the United Kingdom appointed the leader or leader of the majority party in the Commons meeting as the Prime Minister.

Like in France, in the UK The Prime Minister can dismiss the head of the state ministers. However, in the UK, the ability to dismiss the ministers in a theoretical manner is only in the hands of the king or the queen, without the advice of the prime minister, it is not possible to depose a minister in his favor, because he is a systematic ruler.

Therefore, he has a great power in matters related to governance as the head of state. As the military power has been entrusted to him, as well as governance and foreign affairs. Sending the French ambassador and delegates abroad, foreign states The representatives of the delegation, discussing the deal with the foreign state and the agreement passed, the Cabinet Ordinance.

The President’s important governance powers in the event of the signing of administrative signals, influencing the ministers during decision-making and decision-making in the administration, etc.

But in the UK all the political divisions of power are traditionally entrusted with the king or the queen, but in reality, these powers are handed over to the Prime Minister.

In fact, because the King or Queen is the systematic ruler in the United Kingdom, he does not use these powers himself. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister of the United States, used the same powers.

Differences in legislative power:

The French President’s law authority is less than the British Prime Minister’s power. Because the President is not entitled to raise any bill in parliament. But in the UK, because of power-consolidation, together they played a very important role as head of the Department of Justice and Law.

The legislation enacted in the British parliament is composed by the cabinet headed by the Prime Minister. He worked as a leader of parliament. He raised the bill himself or himself in a colleague’s commons meeting.

He can participate in the debate. Demonstrating the demolition of the Commons meeting by the members of the Prime Minister’s meeting. Be able to keep it. Many times, the Prime Minister himself can resign and resent the educated Commons’ meeting.

But in the hands of the French President, there are some special powers in law related to which he is more powerful than the British Prime Minister.

In a bill passed by the parliament, there is no desire to sign the president, but for the sake of the assassination. Within 15 days of being sent, the bill can supplement the parliament for overall or partial review.

Parliament is bound to accept his directive. Thus, in the hands of the French President veto the constitution virtually suspended “. Has given up power.

Some of the presidents can present special bill related to the public bill. Even the constitution He also laments the same power of the sanctioned bill

Due to the breaking up of the national meeting. But before doing this, he has to consult with the Prime Minister and the president of both the chambers of the parliament.

However, he was forced to accept this advice. One restriction on the subject related to it has been practiced effectively by the constitution. After that, he could not break the monopoly within the national party within a year.

If he suspects his constitutional validity in any general law, he can send it to the constitutional council. Macadamias described this power as one of the most voluntary powers.

The Parliament can substantially influence the parliament by making the message to both chambers. Differences in judicial power and the constitution of the French President give some important powers to the judiciary.

He nominated 9 members of the judicial high council, the president of the constitutional council, and three members of the council. Secondly, the constitution entrusted to the independence of the judiciary in his hand.

Thirdly, the French President is the Guardian of the Constitution. So everyone has to be careful about everyone who follows the constitution. In addition to ordinary crimes, he is entitled to show the royalty to the people convicted of special crimes. He can deny the execution of the death sentence.

In all judicial functions, there is a difference between the differences in the status of the constitution of the Russian constitution and the position of emergency in the hands of the French President and the state of emergency in the defense of national independence and geographic integrity or with the approval of international obligations.

The immediate hazard appears and the daily activities of the constitutional government authorities are interrupted, on the way to protect or fulfill international obligations. You can take appropriate action.

However, in the respective matters, he was presided over by both the parliament of the parliament. To consult with the Manik Parishad. Moreover, he can not deny the whole nation about the issue and can not cancel the meeting of the country at the time. During the emergency, the President of the French President.

At the time, the French President has virtually unlimited power to assassinate the British Prime Minister in an emergency, but in reality, the President of the French President, he has gained immense power in the state of emergency.

The then British Prime Minister during World War II cabinet Increasing the abnormal power of Bay proves the truth of this statement. The constitution is the difference between the role of the guardian and the French President is the constitution

Egret. Article 5 of the Constitution says that the President has to respect the constitution so that everyone can respect the constitution so that the President It has to be.

Besides, the president exercised his arbitrariness so that all the state authorities can perform their functions regularly and remain in the continuation of the state. In this section of the constitution, the President has been described as the national independence, the state-level integrity and the protector of the treaty and the treaty of the community.

But the Constitution of the United Kingdom Since the man is unwritten, there is no question of his role as the guardian of the prime minister. In fact, this great power of the French President was jealous of the British Prime Minister.

Members of the parliament are concerned about the differences in constitutional authority and the constitution.

The French President can take initiative. However, the constitutional bill of the Constitution must be of the parliament After being approved by the Joy Room, it has to be presented in the Ashgabat. But no constitution raised by the government.

In order to make a decision to present the constitutional bill in the President’s address, or in the joint session of both the parliament’s chambers. You can In the final case, the consent bill cacannote accepted without the consent of the fifth member.

But the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom possesses the infinite power of the constitutional. Constitutional law and general in the United Kingdom.

Because there is no difference between the law, the Prime Minister can easily accept any constitutional amendment in the general majority of the parliament.

From the aforementioned discussion, it clearly shows that the French President, such as theoretically and in reality, is huge. Powerful, British Prime Minister is not the same. He possesses a lot of power in reality.

The British Prime Minister is not only the chief among the people of the same or small. There is no lunar moon between small stars. He is a sun, around which the planetary system is rotating.

But all depends on the prime minister’s personality, productivity and foresight but according to reality, the French President is much more power and rank than the British Prime Minister.

Increasing the power of the governing body:

The constitution of the constitution has been strengthened more than the parliament or the law department. Under the previous constitution, the lower house of the legislature was particularly strong.

At that time, there was a lot of influence in the national assembly in the formulation of legislation, governance, supervision and control of the governance department. For this reason, the national meeting during the third and fourth Republic era caused the government to cause, or even cancel, the government.

As a result, the stability of the French government was endangered. Often the rise and fall of the government continues to occur. The instability and unrest appear as a misfortune of the French government.

This is the curse from the government. So, in France, the power of the governing power has increased in lieu of parliament. The governance division is much stronger now.

Leave a Comment