What is the Definition of Dictatorship? Definition of Dictatorship

Definition of Dictatorship: 

Political institutions and organizations are a very ancient doctrine of turning dictatorship. Theoretically, the dictatorship is completely opposite rule. In ancient times the signs of the dictatorial rule were observed in the autocratic rule of Greece and Ram. In the twentieth century, in the last two worlds, the kind of dictatorial governance in Italy, Germany, and Russia was inexplicable.

The nature and characteristics of the modern dictatorship bloom. Although the ideological and character differences between A and C dictatorship have been observed, however, similarly the military rule has been established in the same way. Nazi in Germany after the First World War. In many countries, there are many names in the name of disguise and dictatorship in different countries.

In the regime of dictatorship, the government demands absolute dominance and only 9, regards the will as the basis for its supremacy. It is not the kind of power that can be based on the rule of this regime.

The dictatorship arises only when there is a severe crisis in the society when the social system breaks down and when people sacrifice their traditions altogether when the people support a powerful person, for which they can secure and provide justice. At this time they avoided the legal rules.

Attempts are being made to establish the modern-day dictatorship as a strong ideology. Especially in the past century, the failure of democracy in different parts of the world and the release of people’s appetite for democracy. The dictatorship has been in power in many countries and the counter propaganda of democracy And established it.

Definition of dictatorship:

The meaning of the word ‘dictator’ is common in the common meaning and ancient ray. Especially due to the state’s crisis situation, the Ramadan temporarily granted state power to a person. This system was able to achieve considerable popularity in Rama. Again, in the ancient times, some countries see the autocratic monarchy as a dictatorship. Would have been But the current concept of dictatorship is different.

Modern definition and modern-day dictatorship refer to governance, where extreme power is entrusted to the sole leader or leader of any political party, not on the chosen king in succession. In other words, in the regime that the government possesses immense power and the same person exercises powerlessly, it is called dictatorship.

The dictatorship is the rule of dictatorship in the dictatorship. His power is suppressed by a free and vigilant group of power or force. The dictatorship is not the rule established on the consent of the people.

If the rules for his own interests, then he is called dictatorship. He has described the authoritarian government very nicely. Everything in the government is done for the sake of the state. Nothing is against the state and the state. There is nothing in the outside. The dictatorship is a system of governance where governance is central to the hands of a person, party or class, and they are the ultimate political power and authority.

Characteristics of the dictatorship:

The dictatorship is not just the rule of one. A dictatorship is a person or a governor. Or maybe one-party rule. The dictatorship is a strong organization of people or groups. It is bound in bondage. Believe me, believe me, and fight. The main point of the Nazi party in Germany is again. Leadership command is on the head, full confidence and discipline under the feet. To understand the nature of the dictatorship, it is necessary to review its features.

Mentioned four characteristics of the dictatorship.

  1. Extensive application;
  2. One-party system
  3. Nominal and Regulated Legislative Assembly and

     4 Extensive centralization of power.

Some of the dictatorships mentioned in the feature,

  1. Procession of autocratic and exclusive power;
  2. Constitutional extinction:
  3. The abolition of citizens’ municipalities and other rights;
  4. In the decision-making process, it is the dominant power of other minds
  5. The autocratic terms of social and political control

One of the main features of a leader and dictatorial regime is one, who is fully affiliated with his followers, especially the ruling and the people. The people remain upstairs and claim obedient obedience of the people. He is not responsible for the person.

One of the features of the single political party and one political party is dictatorial 9. The structure of the team is usually based on the level serial and some rules And the management of the team is vested with a handful of central leaders. This group consists of a small part of the entire population.

One leader in the signboard:

Using intimidation as a tool to deliberately and consciously control the masses in deliberate intimidation and dictatorial regime. Again, barbarism and disgrace are sometimes congratulated as a real goal. Moreover, the turmoil and barbarism were praised. The ruler of dictator Hitler once said that only Mother Power rules. Power is the first law.

All the reports related to centralized economic systems and economic planning are edited by the trusted person of the central leadership of information and data. They are economic. The final decision is taken in respect of development. Full authority and civilian government on civilian weapons possess exclusive powers of construction and use of weapons. They think that the more people who have control over the weapon, the easier it will be to defeat competing forces.

In this regime, idealism is considered as a fundamental principle, and all the citizens of the state at least believe in it. This ideal state explains all the aspects of the lives of all people inside and coordinates.

Advanced control over the system and the latest technology techniques are used for all types of zygotes. The party’s exclusive authority exists on the medium. Plus, faster news sharing

Terrorist police and indigenous forces and state law in violent and terrorist ways. They were brought to the police station. Discipline is protected. Those who oppose the leader or think of leaders as unwelcome. In the thought of Utopian and the dictatorship, the passion and imagination of the state are quite far away. Since then, happiness and peace will come down to human life. Not a goal.

The judiciary is under the control of the dictatorship. The trial work is done with respect to the position. As a result, there is no justice. In the closed legislation and in the regime of dictatorship, the legislature exists, but no other role can be observed. There is no importance. Due to the one-party system, except for making public decisions, it is known as a valuable monopoly in governance.

It is a man with a very human quality. He has driven society into a particular sector. For all in the society and the loyalty of the society, the dictatorship of internationalism has led to the formation of the barbarism of Atavism and the society keeps society ready in the society. = To say, “In the case of women, maternal death is the same as in the case of normal men.” This regime prevents international peace.

The concept of a unified and well-organized society is adopted in the dictatorship-oriented society as a united and organized institution. As a result, there is no place for polytheists in this system. Theirs. In some cases in the form of extreme nationalism and the demand for national excellence, nationalism was developed in any civilization and its form is everywhere. In some cases, it is thought to be established in society. Somehow or the ideals of the world are promoted by the world.

The domination of state authority and dominance of state authority in the regime of dictatorship. Is recognizable. To which the state’s authority is published around individual life. The influence of the state is seen in education, culture, politics, religion and social life.

Intellectuals and logic: Free intellectual and rationalism is prohibited under any dictatorship. The Nazis rebelled against the logic.

Publicity is centered and the campaign is centralized in this regime. These are not only the mediums but they also succeeded in successfully developing and shaping their mentality and mentality until the time of their birth.

The principles of dictatorship:

In the twentieth century, the dictatorship was a complete rule of law, but some of them have qualities that are presented below.

It is a stable, stable governance and the main attribute of this ruling system. Governance Because it is not directed to the public or intentionally. Moreover, the people cannot change this kind of government if they wish.

Progressive governance and dictatorship regime prevailed in conservative and equitable. Because it is the educated and well-governed person. Besides, he is very enthusiastic about the new ideas, discoveries, and innovations of the dictatorship, wise and wise.

There is no VB group in the government to increase the efficiency of the government and governance under a dictatorship, but there is no courage to enforce the government’s work. This government can efficiently manage governance. As a result, the government increased the amount of breath.

The party is faulty and there is only one political party in this regime. Because of this, the party crises, internal conflicts, conflict or conflict etc. are seen in the regime of dictatorship, it is possible to adopt and implement a long-term plan, and in the dictatorship system, when it can not undermine the dictator. So it is stable. As a result, the dictator can take and implement long-term plans.

Enlightenment of knowledge: In this rule, the dictatorship is very wise and efficient. There is a great spread of knowledge and science in saving dictatorial rule. It can not get rid of corruption sooner due to one of the factors of this regime. In the rule of law, administrative officials are not easily sedentary in corruption.

The educated and well-meaning government and governance dictates the rule of the people. In this regime, all powers are held in the hands of a person. So he can manage the administration with utmost efficiency. The dictatorship is not expensive: it is not expensive governance. There is a person’s ability to govern, for which administrative expenditure is very low.

Emergency system and dictatorships are very useful for an emergency. Governance Because in this regime, the dictator decides on himself at any critical moment. you can do. For which there is no discussion liaison.

Dictators are experienced in administrative matters during the rule of the bureaucracy And the welfare of the people is achieved. Have lived. So he is not dependent on bureaucrats. Because of which the influence of bureaucrats is of utmost importance. In the regime of dictatorial rule, the majority opinion is not given priority. The decisive decision that the dictator here accepts is the final decision.

The dictatorship of the dictatorship:

Contradictory governance of democracy in the regime of dictatorship There are both faults, virtues in this regime. However, it is more than the fault of the quality. In the modern world, this rule has become stagnant. Below the blunder of the dictatorial system:

The rule of law is not effective in this regime. As a result, instead of rule of law, the rule of the person gets dominant. With the possibility of revolution and the dictatorship, the ruler does not work for the protection of the wishes and interests of the people. Therefore, people have revolutionized the dictatorship to protect the interests of the people and bring down a dictatorship.

In the dictatorship, each person cannot do directly or in parallel state affairs. For this, people can think of dictatorship as their own government. The patriotism of the people is not increased under the system. In the Araguaya and in this regime, the dictatorship imposes any decision through force.

Responsible governance and dictatorial rule exist. There is only one power in this regime. With the death of this ruling system, it fell. The 4th regime of international peace is contrary to international peace. Mussolini, one of the key proponents of Laugh, has called international peace as a coward’s dream.

Long peace is not possible, nor is it satisfactory. ” The lawmaker can not make a law according to his wishes, but the dictator’s desire to become a law enacted in the provincial legislature and dictatorial regime.

There is no reason for reasoning in the absurd rule and dictatorship. Any decision made in this system is not accepted through discussion. Because, in this regime, the dictator himself made any decision and implemented.

In this system of rule, the rule of governance and despotism is disgusting and condemned in modern times. Because, in this regime, the amount of fault is multiplied more than quality. Dictator ruled. Funny no one prefers. As a result, there is no welfare of the people. Non-liability and dictatorship is unbearable governance. In this regime. The dictatorship is not responsible for the people.

In this regime, the person can not develop his personality and life. Because the dictatorship always acts as a counter-indigenous person. The dictator controls the whole life of a person. In this regime, the state is placed above the person.

Lack of good relations with the ruler and governance and the dictatorship of the regime does not create good relations between the ruler and the ruled. Because governance is neglected by the rule of this regime, ignoring the will of the ruled. The welfare of the ruler is achieved without the welfare of the person. Therefore, there is a lack of good relations between rulers and ruled in this regime.

The difference between democracy and dictatorship

Democracy and dictatorship are two different regimes. There is a great difference between both nature and qualitative judgment. The differences are as follows:

Democracy governance of the people, rule of dictatorship and rule of people governed by the people in a demolition of democracy. That is, the sovereign power in the democracy is entrusted to the public. And the people are the source of all power. But in the dictatorship, the sovereign power of the state is entrusted with the dictatorship.

There is a difference between democracy, in the context of a theoretical basis. The great ideals of humanity, ideological theory and the ideals of the mill. Established democracy. On the other hand, the Hegelian idealism on the basis of the dictatorship is established on the basis of democracy, the state was formed on the basis of conclusions made by the governing authority of dictatorship and by debate-debate.

Because the people want it, democracy is governed in the same manner. But dictatorship is governed by dictatorship and direction. Professor Haynes is right “the emphasis of the argument in the democracy is emphasized, and the dictatorship of the power of the dictatorship

Democracy in a democracy recognizes ethology in dictatorship and democracy is confident inequality and moral principles. It prohibits all forms of discrimination. But in the beliefs of ethnicity and against the principles of ethnicity. In this, discrimination is supported on the basis of ethnicity.

The person in democracy, but in the dictatorship, the state is the head and dictatorial state, and then the person. Here the person is not the state for the person, the person for the person. But the all-around well-being is considered to be the ultimate goal of the state. Here’s the first sentence.

The state is not a person for democracy, it is not a person for the state. Independence is recognized in the dynamics, unacceptable in dictatorship and democracy is believed in public sovereignty. This regime is the guarantee of independence.  On the contrary, Akron is against the threat of independence. The rule of law in democracy was established. The dictatorship of autocracy is established in a dictatorship.

Democracy is not a pro-government, dictatorship, for the sake of a large state: Democracy is particularly favored for it. Because the power is decentralized here. But the dictatorship is in the state .. Power is centralized. So the dictatorship is desirable for the small country, but the autonomy of the people is recognized in the autonomous body, unacceptable in dictatorship and autonomy of democracy. In the dictatorship but autonomy is not accepted.

There is no fear of revolution in democracy, there is a dictatorship and autonomy is recognized. The dialogue between democracy is governed by politics. So there is no anger in the people’s mind. That is why democracy is free from the threat of revolution. But the sole influence of state control in the dictatorship swallows private life. That resulted in public opinion Anger and learning continue to grow. So the fear of revolution in the dictatorship is always present.

Democracy is contrary to world peace, anti-dictatorship, and democracy, and in all areas believe in the principle of peaceful co-existence. In the global field, the dictatorship of democracy and harmony is so contrary to world peace. Greasy Denying all forms of force, democracy is confident in the ideals of establishing world peace. On the other hand, in the dictatorships, extreme and narrow nationalism created the horrors of war.

In the democracy, the dominant role played by the many parties and political parties in the independence role has been acknowledged. In the same context, conflicts, divorces, and public opinion are concerned about the stability of the government. So this is a rule of many parties, but in a dictatorship, a group and democracy have different types of identity and multiple existences. Country

Political parties can not rule in the regime. After reviewing the government’s inaccuracy and complying with public opinion. The existence of a group or individual of the dictatorship

Is not. As a result, the dictatorship of the hero and his party was established. There is stability in the system, there is no democracy and democracy in each other’s interests. Due to the change of public opinion, the government changes frequently.

So there is uncertainty about it. In the dictatorship, the one-party rule of the hero is established by the rule of established rule, the conflict of interest, the defection, etc. As a result, there is no uncertainty in the mechanism of durability. A firm and stable governance system was established.

A succession of emergency, democracy, and democracy are decentralized! Evil regime in slowing down democracy. The democratic government can not do so quickly, with the help of war, an externalize. In this situation, democracy is virtually inconvenient. In an emergency, the government can take quick decisions and firmly deal with the situation. , The evil of individualism lies in the futile democracy, not the communist dictatorship.

In the case of individualism, it recognizes, As a result, the benefits of profitability, unemployment, and other forms of law and order have resulted in democracy. On the other hand, all this in the Communist dictatorship. It is completely free from malfunction. Errors of the system are in a democracy, not in a dictatorship: Many groups in democracy win the existence. Therefore, in the democracy, the system of a bad system is completely present. But in the dictatorship. There are only political parties, so the faults of the system are not seen in the dictatorship.

Democracy is costly and democracy is charged with costly governance. Dictatorship Expenses go to the forefront.

Democracy is better than multi-level dictatorship. Governance Democracy prohibits the rule of the people and the dictatorship of the people. So the ideal. Democratically known and well-known government system, in the direction of fairness and quality excellence. The superiority of democracy is beyond the debate.

In the present world, democracy is the best and wiser regime. Besides, only the golden era of autonomy was found in the democratic system. This priceless Sue-gag of autonomy cannot be ignored in any way and for some reason. Good governance can never be considered an alternative to autonomy.

Better governance than democracy dictatorship Democracy It is possible to avoid the slightest blame but it can not be blamed on the dictatorship of the dictatorship without the slightest blame. The benefits of democracy can never be achieved in a dictatorship. That’s why this is the reason. It is reasonable to say that dictatorship cannot be an alternative to democracy. Democracy is the best. Accepted by the world as a government.

Leave a Comment